Public procurement
21372316
Lotul nr. 3 Enterprise Storage (Sisteme de stocare) tip 1(SAS SSD)
1
Enquiry period
with 26.02.2025 16:06
to 10.03.2025 10:00
to 10.03.2025 10:00
2
Bidding period
with 10.03.2025 10:00
to 19.03.2025 10:00
to 19.03.2025 10:00
3
Auction
with 20.03.2025 13:37
to 20.03.2025 13:55
to 20.03.2025 13:55
4
Evaluation
5
Bids have been evaluated
Status
Active
Estimated value without VAT
17 890 453,94 MDL
Period of clarifications:
26 Feb 2025, 16:06 - 10 Mar 2025, 10:00
Submission of proposals:
10 Mar 2025, 10:00 - 19 Mar 2025, 10:00
Auction start date:
20 Mar 2025, 13:37
Supplier technical support:
(+373) 79999801
Echipament nou și nerecondiționat, produs minim trim. I anul 2024, corespunzător tipului de dispozitive de nivel Enterprise, produs de producători renumiți (Brand name internațional). Configuraţia echipamentului trebuie să fie compusă din componente reciproc compatibile şi să asigure funcţionarea optimă a sistemului în ansamblu.
Type: Enterprise-grade Storage with SAS SSDs.
Form Factor: min. 2U rack-mountable chassis, fully compatible with the EIA-310 standard for rack mounting. The solution must include all necessary components (e.g., rails, mounting brackets).
Availability requirements:
The equipment must be working in Symmetric Active-Active mode, which means that in the case of 100% utilization, ensures following:
- The storage system architecture must ensure that, in the event of a controller failure, the write cache of the surviving controller(s) remains fully operational and protected. The equipment must utilize mechanisms such as cache mirroring or equivalent protection to guarantee data integrity. Under no circumstances should the write cache be deactivated, operated without mirroring, or left without an alternative protection mechanism to prevent data loss or corruption.
- The system must ensure a high availability rate of at least 99.9999%, minimizing downtime and guaranteeing continuous operation,
- The system's efficiency must remain unaffected in the event of a failure of up to 50% of the controllers, maintaining consistent operational capability - alive with a single active controller,
- The system must sustain its required performance levels without degradation in the event of a failure affecting half of the controllers,
- The system must include robust, built-in mechanisms for non-disruptive software updates, ensuring no compromise in availability or loss of access to stored data during version upgrades.
The storage system must ensure uninterrupted data availability and full operational continuity in the following failure scenarios:
- failure of a single power supply line, ensuring redundancy in power management,
- failure of any individual controller, with automatic failover mechanisms to maintain functionality - alive with a single active controller,
- simultaneous failures of up to two user data storage drives, with no loss of data integrity or accessibility,
- failures of any Fibre Channel (FC) or iSCSI port, with seamless rerouting of traffic to alternate pathways.
The equipment must support hot-swappable replacement of critical components without interrupting access to data or degrading system performance. These components include, but are not limited to: controllers, power supplies, cooling fans, front-end and back-end ports, and storage drives. The hot replacement process must ensure seamless operation and maintain data availability throughout.
The system must be designed to withstand the simultaneous failure of at least two storage devices (e.g., drives, NVMe, or flash modules), regardless of the system's scale or configuration. In such scenarios, the equipment must ensure uninterrupted data access and maintain full data integrity.
The system must include functionality to safely disable the storage drives without causing any loss or corruption of user data, ensuring seamless operational continuity during maintenance or decommissioning.
Type Drives:
Enterprise-grade SAS SSDs utilizing TLC (Triple-Level Cell) or eTLC (Enhanced Triple-Level Cell) technology, optimized for high-performance, high-reliability applications in enterprise environments.
Capacity:
The system must provide a marked usable storage capacity (before data reduction) of minimum 200 TB, ensuring sufficient space for high-demand enterprise applications.
Hot Spare Configuration(optional):
The solution must optionally support Hot Spare components, including spare controllers or disks, to enhance system redundancy. These spare components must remain inactive during regular operations but should automatically activate to maintain full system functionality in case of hardware failure.
RAID (if the equipment involves the use of RAID):
- The system must support advanced RAID levels, including minimum:
RAID 6: Ensuring double parity protection, allowing the system to tolerate simultaneous failure of two drives without data loss.
Cache requirement(if the equipment involves the use of memory cache for data):
If the storage system includes a cache mechanism, the system must provide a minimum of 512 GB of dedicated cache memory per node, ensuring high-speed data processing and optimal system performance.
The cache must support advanced features such as:
- Cache mirroring - to ensure data integrity and protection in the event of a node failure.
- Dynamic allocation - enabling efficient use of cache resources based on real-time workload demands.
- Non-volatile cache - to prevent data loss during power failures or unexpected shutdowns, ensuring all cached data is retained.
The cache must be optimized for handling high IOPS workloads and ensuring low-latency operations, particularly for enterprise-grade applications.
Controllers requirement:
The storage system must include minimum one node equipped with a minimum of two fully redundant controllers configured in High Availability (HA) mode.
The controllers must:
- Operate in an Active-Active configuration, ensuring balanced workload distribution and seamless failover capabilities without performance degradation.
- Support advanced fault-tolerant mechanisms to maintain uninterrupted access to data during hardware failures or maintenance.
- Be hot-swappable, allowing replacement or upgrade without disrupting system operations or data availability.
- Include built-in synchronization mechanisms to maintain consistency between controllers, including mirroring of critical operational data such as cache contents and configuration settings.
The system must ensure that the failure of one controller does not impact the performance, availability, or operational integrity of the other controller.
Cluster and replication requirements:
1. Synchronous replication capability:
- The storage solution must support synchronous replication to enable the creation of an Active-Active cluster between two physically separated server rooms (located in separate buildings).
- The system must ensure zero Recovery Point Objective (RPO) by maintaining data consistency across the cluster in real time.
2. Comprehensive hardware inclusion:
- The solution must include all necessary hardware components to fully implement synchronous replication functionality, utilizing Fibre Channel (FC) protocols for high-speed, low-latency data transmission.
3. Flexible volume replication:
- The system must support synchronous replication for a minimum of one Logical Unit Number (LUN) and scale seamlessly to replicate multiple LUNs simultaneously.
- Changes to the number of replicated volumes must not require modifications to the physical hardware configuration of the storage system.
4. Data consistency and synchronization:
- The contents of all cluster volumes must remain identical across both systems in the cluster at all times, ensuring data consistency and integrity.
- The system must include mechanisms to handle data synchronization efficiently during recovery scenarios, ensuring minimal impact on performance and availability.
5. Resiliency and high availability:
- The cluster must provide continuous operation in the event of a hardware failure, network disruption, or planned maintenance at one site, without compromising data integrity or availability.
- The system must be designed to support failover and failback between the two sites automatically and transparently.
Performance requirements:
1. Minimum performance metrics:
- the storage solution must deliver a combined performance of minimum 300,000 Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) with inline data reduction (deduplication and compression).
2. Performance calculation parameters:
IOPS performance must be evaluated based on the following metrics:
- read/write ratio: 70% read / 30% write.
- block sizes: support for operations with block sizes of 16 KB, 32 KB, and 64 KB to accommodate varying workload requirements.
- I/O patterns: include both sequential and random I/O workloads.
- latency: ensure a maximum delay of 1 millisecond (0.001 s) under full load conditions.
3. Consistency of performance:
- the system must maintain the required performance levels even under high concurrency and mixed workload conditions.
- performance must remain unaffected during maintenance operations, including firmware updates, drive rebuilds, or component failures.
4. Performance verification:
- vendors must provide detailed benchmark test results to validate the stated performance – for operations with block sizes 16 KB(mandatory), 32 KB and 64 KB(optionall), using industry-standard tools such as IOmeter or FIO, under the specified conditions.
- results must demonstrate compliance with all stated parameters, including latency and I/O patterns.
5. Monitoring and optimization:
- the system must include tools to monitor and optimize performance dynamically, offering real-time insights into throughput, latency, and IOPS for proactive performance tuning.
Supported protocols:
- FC,
- iSCSI,
Features:
Dedicated system management interfaces:
1. The system must include dedicated physical and/or virtual interfaces specifically for system management.
2. These interfaces should allow out-of-band management, ensuring that administrative tasks can be performed without impacting data traffic.
3. Management interfaces must support the following functionalities:
- Web-based GUI for ease of access.
- Command-line interface (CLI) for advanced configuration.
- Support for industry-standard protocols such as SSH, SNMP, and REST API for integration with monitoring and orchestration tools.
- Role-based access control (RBAC) to ensure secure system administration.
4. Redundancy for management interfaces:
- to ensure availability, the management interfaces must support redundancy, allowing continuous system management even in the event of a single interface failure.
5. Protocol optimization:
The system must include protocol-specific optimizations such as:
- Multipath I/O (MPIO) for FC and iSCSI to ensure high availability and load balancing.
- Support for jumbo frames in iSCSI for improved performance in high-throughput environments.
6. Compliance and Interoperability:
The system must be compliant with industry standards for both FC and iSCSI protocols. It must ensure interoperability with third-party devices, including servers, switches, and network adapters.
Deduplication and compression requirements:
1. Functional capabilities:
The storage system must provide deduplication functionality for data stored at the block level (iSCSI/FC LUN) and file level, with the following specifics:
- Deduplication must operate both at the volume level and globally across the system, ensuring optimal storage efficiency.
The system must also include compression functionality for:
- Block-level volumes (iSCSI/FC LUN).
2. Interoperability and unrestricted functionality:
Deduplication and compression features must operate seamlessly without introducing limitations or restrictions on simultaneous use of other critical functionalities, including but not limited to:
- Data replication.
- Thin provisioning.
- Backups.
- Volume cloning.
3. Inline deduplication and compression:
- Both deduplication and compression mechanisms must function in in-line mode, ensuring real-time data optimization without requiring post-processing.
- Deduplication must remain continuously active and cannot be disabled or bypassed by system administrators or any other means, ensuring consistent storage efficiency and data integrity.
- Storage solutions that rely on scheduled or job-based data reduction processes are not acceptable.
4. Licensing and support:
All features related to deduplication and compression must be:
- Fully licensed (if required by vendor provisions) and included in the offer, eliminating additional licensing costs for essential functionality.
- Supported by the storage system in its maximum configuration, ensuring scalability and compatibility across all deployment scenarios.
5. Performance and reliability considerations:
- The deduplication and compression mechanisms must not introduce significant latency or impact the system’s performance metrics, such as IOPS or throughput.
- Mechanisms should include built-in error detection and correction to maintain data integrity during deduplication and compression processes.
6. Management and monitoring:
The system must provide a dedicated interface or tools for monitoring deduplication and compression efficiency, including:
- Space savings metrics.
- Real-time and historical performance impacts.
- Detailed logs of deduplication and compression activities.
Snapshot requirements:
1. General functionality:
- The system must support snapshot functionality at a minimum for block-level volumes (LUNs), ensuring operational flexibility.
- The snapshot functionality must be applicable to both LUNs and other supported volumes without imposing restrictions on the simultaneous use of other critical system functions, including replication, backups, and cloning.
2. Snapshot quantity and retention:
- The system must provide the ability to create and manage a minimum of 365 snapshots per shared volume, supporting long-term operational and recovery needs.
- Snapshots must be configurable with retention policies to optimize storage space and align with data governance requirements.
3. Performance efficiency:
- The implementation of snapshots must not degrade overall system performance, regardless of the number of active snapshots or system workload.
- The system must include optimization mechanisms, such as metadata indexing and intelligent snapshot scheduling, to minimize latency and maintain high performance.
4. Space efficiency:
- Snapshot functionality must employ a cost-effective approach by storing only the delta (changes) from the original data. This ensures minimal storage consumption while preserving full data access and recovery capabilities.
5. Integration with storage QoS:
- The system must support performance monitoring and prioritization mechanisms for snapshots, enabling administrators to enforce Storage QoS (Quality of Service) policies at both the volume and LUN levels.
- These QoS policies should dynamically allocate resources to prioritize performance-critical snapshots, ensuring minimal impact on other operations.
6. Advanced features:
Snapshots must support:
- Application-consistent snapshots, ensuring data integrity for workloads such as databases and virtualized environments.
- Writable snapshots, allowing clones to be created for development, testing, or analytics without affecting the production environment.
Snapshots must be compatible with data replication workflows, ensuring consistent replication of both primary data and snapshot states across systems.
7. Monitoring and reporting:
- The system must include a dedicated interface or tools for managing, monitoring, and reporting on snapshot performance, space utilization, and recovery operations.
- Real-time alerts and historical logs must be available for visibility into snapshot performance and potential bottlenecks.
Encryption requirements:
1. Encryption standard:
- The solution must support encryption of all stored data using a minimum of the AES-256 algorithm or a stronger industry-standard encryption algorithm, ensuring compliance with modern security and regulatory standards.
2. Scope of encryption:
- Encryption must be applied to all drives, NVMe, and flash storage within the device, covering the entire data storage ecosystem.
- Encryption must extend to data at rest across all volumes, snapshots, backups, and metadata associated with the system.
3. Performance integrity:
- Encryption functionality must operate with no measurable impact on system performance, ensuring IOPS, throughput, and latency metrics remain consistent with non-encrypted operations.
- The system must leverage hardware-accelerated encryption or equivalent technologies to maintain optimal performance during data encryption and decryption processes.
4. Key management:
- The solution must generate encryption keys using a secure hardware-based random number generator, ensuring keys are robust and resistant to attacks.
- Encryption keys must be securely stored on the equipment, leveraging a dedicated hardware security module (HSM) or equivalent secure enclave to isolate keys from unauthorized access.
- The system must ensure that data stored on drives/NVMe/flash cannot be accessed if the storage media is removed from the device or if the device itself is compromised.
5. Key backup and recovery:
- The system must include mechanisms for secure backup and recovery of encryption keys, supporting integration with external key management systems (KMS) compliant with KMIP (Key Management Interoperability Protocol) standards.
- Key rotation and lifecycle management should be automated and configurable to align with organizational policies and compliance requirements.
6. Encryption for replication and snapshots:
- The encryption functionality must extend to replicated data and snapshots, ensuring consistency in encryption across all replicated sites or volumes.
- Encryption must not disrupt or degrade replication workflows, including synchronous and asynchronous modes.
Monitoring requirements:
1. Analytical platform or portal:
- The system must include a robust analytical platform or virtual machine (VM) accessible via a web browser-based portal.
- The platform must provide an intuitive, user-friendly interface with interactive dashboards for data visualization and management.
2. Log collection and reporting:
The platform must automatically collect and analyze logs from the device and present them as customizable graphs, reports, and alerts, covering the following:
2.1. Storage utilization:
- Real-time and historical monitoring of used space.
- Display of the data reduction indicator, accounting for deduplication and compression (excluding thin provisioning, if applicable).
- Granular visibility at both the global device level and the local LUN level.
2.2. Space growth prediction:
- Advanced forecasting tools for predicting space growth, factoring in deduplication, compression, and provisioning trends.
- Tools for future expansion analysis, including recommendations for scaling.
3. Component monitoring:
The system must include an application or hardware-based monitoring solution to oversee and report detailed events for the following physical and logical components:
- Physical components: controllers, drives, ports, power supplies, and network interfaces.
- Logical components: volumes, LUNs, replication processes, deduplication, and compression algorithms.
4. Performance monitoring:
The portal must provide minimum:
- Real-time and historical performance metrics for individual resources.
- Key parameters to monitor: Latency, Read and Write IOPS, Bandwidth.
Performance data must be available at both the global system level and the LUN level.
5. Storage QoS and prioritization:
- The system must include a performance monitoring and prioritization mechanism for Storage QoS, configurable at both the volume and LUN levels.
- QoS metrics should be adjustable in real-time to meet dynamic workload demands.
6. Reporting and alerting:
The portal must provide comprehensive reporting capabilities, including at least:
- Capacity reports: current usage, available space, and forecasted capacity needs.
- Performance reports: historical trends and real-time analytics of system performance.
- Future space predictions: automated simulations for capacity increases based on application type and workload.
- Event logs: authorization attempts, executed commands, and system alerts for security and operational events.
- Technical support logs: level of support received, resolution times, and incident history.
7. Operational monitoring:
- Snapshot and replication status: display the real-time status of operations such as snapshots, synchronous/asynchronous replication, and recovery tasks.
- Threat alerts: warnings related to system integrity, user activity, or misconfigurations.
- Optimization insights: recommendations for system performance improvement, resource reallocation, or energy efficiency.
8. Configuration verification and upgrades:
- The platform must include an algorithm for verifying configuration correctness and compatibility with potential device or cluster upgrades.
9. Simulation and optimization:
- The platform must enable capacity simulation tools to project storage needs based on application types and expected workloads.
- Display real-time system consumption metrics with actionable optimization guidelines for improving performance and efficiency.
NICs included per controller:
Min. 1 x 1GE for management;
Min. 2 x 32G FC SFP28(850nm SFP+ SR MM module included) for data transfer;
Min. 2 x 32G FC dedicated for replication (metro cluster).
Supported operating environments:
Microsoft Windows Server;
Red Hat Enterprise Linux;
VMware (VMware ESXi);
Power supplies included:
The system must include a minimum of two (2) hot-swappable (hot-plug) Power Supply Units (PSUs).
The PSUs must support at least 1+1 redundancy, ensuring continuous operation in case of failure of one PSU.
Power cables included must meet the following specifications:
- Type: IEC C13 to C14.
- Minimum length: 0.6 meters (24 inches).
Cerințe obligatorii pentru prestarea serviciilor de punere în funcțiune, a garanției și a serviciilor de suport (deservire și mentenanță) a bunurilor - conform Anexei la Anunțul de participare.
Toate licențele necesare (dacă se aplică conform termenilor și condițiilor producătorului) pentru caracteristicile platformei/portalului de monitorizare (analitică) și software-ului/firmware-ului specific sistemului de stocare, inclusiv actualizările/patch-urile periodice, trebuie să fie incluse în ofertă și furnizate pe o bază perpetuă - valabile obligatoriu pentru durata integrală de viață a sistemului de stocare.
Termeni și condiții:
Toate cerințele sunt minime și obligatorii;
O cerință nu trebuie să limiteze o altă cerință;
Toate componentele trebuie să fie actuale și să nu fie promovate ca EOS (sfârșitul vânzării/suportului) / EOL (sfârșitul duratei de viață);
Extinderea memoriei (ram) și a capacității de stocare nu trebuie să includă limitări hardware sau software.
Type: Enterprise-grade Storage with SAS SSDs.
Form Factor: min. 2U rack-mountable chassis, fully compatible with the EIA-310 standard for rack mounting. The solution must include all necessary components (e.g., rails, mounting brackets).
Availability requirements:
The equipment must be working in Symmetric Active-Active mode, which means that in the case of 100% utilization, ensures following:
- The storage system architecture must ensure that, in the event of a controller failure, the write cache of the surviving controller(s) remains fully operational and protected. The equipment must utilize mechanisms such as cache mirroring or equivalent protection to guarantee data integrity. Under no circumstances should the write cache be deactivated, operated without mirroring, or left without an alternative protection mechanism to prevent data loss or corruption.
- The system must ensure a high availability rate of at least 99.9999%, minimizing downtime and guaranteeing continuous operation,
- The system's efficiency must remain unaffected in the event of a failure of up to 50% of the controllers, maintaining consistent operational capability - alive with a single active controller,
- The system must sustain its required performance levels without degradation in the event of a failure affecting half of the controllers,
- The system must include robust, built-in mechanisms for non-disruptive software updates, ensuring no compromise in availability or loss of access to stored data during version upgrades.
The storage system must ensure uninterrupted data availability and full operational continuity in the following failure scenarios:
- failure of a single power supply line, ensuring redundancy in power management,
- failure of any individual controller, with automatic failover mechanisms to maintain functionality - alive with a single active controller,
- simultaneous failures of up to two user data storage drives, with no loss of data integrity or accessibility,
- failures of any Fibre Channel (FC) or iSCSI port, with seamless rerouting of traffic to alternate pathways.
The equipment must support hot-swappable replacement of critical components without interrupting access to data or degrading system performance. These components include, but are not limited to: controllers, power supplies, cooling fans, front-end and back-end ports, and storage drives. The hot replacement process must ensure seamless operation and maintain data availability throughout.
The system must be designed to withstand the simultaneous failure of at least two storage devices (e.g., drives, NVMe, or flash modules), regardless of the system's scale or configuration. In such scenarios, the equipment must ensure uninterrupted data access and maintain full data integrity.
The system must include functionality to safely disable the storage drives without causing any loss or corruption of user data, ensuring seamless operational continuity during maintenance or decommissioning.
Type Drives:
Enterprise-grade SAS SSDs utilizing TLC (Triple-Level Cell) or eTLC (Enhanced Triple-Level Cell) technology, optimized for high-performance, high-reliability applications in enterprise environments.
Capacity:
The system must provide a marked usable storage capacity (before data reduction) of minimum 200 TB, ensuring sufficient space for high-demand enterprise applications.
Hot Spare Configuration(optional):
The solution must optionally support Hot Spare components, including spare controllers or disks, to enhance system redundancy. These spare components must remain inactive during regular operations but should automatically activate to maintain full system functionality in case of hardware failure.
RAID (if the equipment involves the use of RAID):
- The system must support advanced RAID levels, including minimum:
RAID 6: Ensuring double parity protection, allowing the system to tolerate simultaneous failure of two drives without data loss.
Cache requirement(if the equipment involves the use of memory cache for data):
If the storage system includes a cache mechanism, the system must provide a minimum of 512 GB of dedicated cache memory per node, ensuring high-speed data processing and optimal system performance.
The cache must support advanced features such as:
- Cache mirroring - to ensure data integrity and protection in the event of a node failure.
- Dynamic allocation - enabling efficient use of cache resources based on real-time workload demands.
- Non-volatile cache - to prevent data loss during power failures or unexpected shutdowns, ensuring all cached data is retained.
The cache must be optimized for handling high IOPS workloads and ensuring low-latency operations, particularly for enterprise-grade applications.
Controllers requirement:
The storage system must include minimum one node equipped with a minimum of two fully redundant controllers configured in High Availability (HA) mode.
The controllers must:
- Operate in an Active-Active configuration, ensuring balanced workload distribution and seamless failover capabilities without performance degradation.
- Support advanced fault-tolerant mechanisms to maintain uninterrupted access to data during hardware failures or maintenance.
- Be hot-swappable, allowing replacement or upgrade without disrupting system operations or data availability.
- Include built-in synchronization mechanisms to maintain consistency between controllers, including mirroring of critical operational data such as cache contents and configuration settings.
The system must ensure that the failure of one controller does not impact the performance, availability, or operational integrity of the other controller.
Cluster and replication requirements:
1. Synchronous replication capability:
- The storage solution must support synchronous replication to enable the creation of an Active-Active cluster between two physically separated server rooms (located in separate buildings).
- The system must ensure zero Recovery Point Objective (RPO) by maintaining data consistency across the cluster in real time.
2. Comprehensive hardware inclusion:
- The solution must include all necessary hardware components to fully implement synchronous replication functionality, utilizing Fibre Channel (FC) protocols for high-speed, low-latency data transmission.
3. Flexible volume replication:
- The system must support synchronous replication for a minimum of one Logical Unit Number (LUN) and scale seamlessly to replicate multiple LUNs simultaneously.
- Changes to the number of replicated volumes must not require modifications to the physical hardware configuration of the storage system.
4. Data consistency and synchronization:
- The contents of all cluster volumes must remain identical across both systems in the cluster at all times, ensuring data consistency and integrity.
- The system must include mechanisms to handle data synchronization efficiently during recovery scenarios, ensuring minimal impact on performance and availability.
5. Resiliency and high availability:
- The cluster must provide continuous operation in the event of a hardware failure, network disruption, or planned maintenance at one site, without compromising data integrity or availability.
- The system must be designed to support failover and failback between the two sites automatically and transparently.
Performance requirements:
1. Minimum performance metrics:
- the storage solution must deliver a combined performance of minimum 300,000 Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) with inline data reduction (deduplication and compression).
2. Performance calculation parameters:
IOPS performance must be evaluated based on the following metrics:
- read/write ratio: 70% read / 30% write.
- block sizes: support for operations with block sizes of 16 KB, 32 KB, and 64 KB to accommodate varying workload requirements.
- I/O patterns: include both sequential and random I/O workloads.
- latency: ensure a maximum delay of 1 millisecond (0.001 s) under full load conditions.
3. Consistency of performance:
- the system must maintain the required performance levels even under high concurrency and mixed workload conditions.
- performance must remain unaffected during maintenance operations, including firmware updates, drive rebuilds, or component failures.
4. Performance verification:
- vendors must provide detailed benchmark test results to validate the stated performance – for operations with block sizes 16 KB(mandatory), 32 KB and 64 KB(optionall), using industry-standard tools such as IOmeter or FIO, under the specified conditions.
- results must demonstrate compliance with all stated parameters, including latency and I/O patterns.
5. Monitoring and optimization:
- the system must include tools to monitor and optimize performance dynamically, offering real-time insights into throughput, latency, and IOPS for proactive performance tuning.
Supported protocols:
- FC,
- iSCSI,
Features:
Dedicated system management interfaces:
1. The system must include dedicated physical and/or virtual interfaces specifically for system management.
2. These interfaces should allow out-of-band management, ensuring that administrative tasks can be performed without impacting data traffic.
3. Management interfaces must support the following functionalities:
- Web-based GUI for ease of access.
- Command-line interface (CLI) for advanced configuration.
- Support for industry-standard protocols such as SSH, SNMP, and REST API for integration with monitoring and orchestration tools.
- Role-based access control (RBAC) to ensure secure system administration.
4. Redundancy for management interfaces:
- to ensure availability, the management interfaces must support redundancy, allowing continuous system management even in the event of a single interface failure.
5. Protocol optimization:
The system must include protocol-specific optimizations such as:
- Multipath I/O (MPIO) for FC and iSCSI to ensure high availability and load balancing.
- Support for jumbo frames in iSCSI for improved performance in high-throughput environments.
6. Compliance and Interoperability:
The system must be compliant with industry standards for both FC and iSCSI protocols. It must ensure interoperability with third-party devices, including servers, switches, and network adapters.
Deduplication and compression requirements:
1. Functional capabilities:
The storage system must provide deduplication functionality for data stored at the block level (iSCSI/FC LUN) and file level, with the following specifics:
- Deduplication must operate both at the volume level and globally across the system, ensuring optimal storage efficiency.
The system must also include compression functionality for:
- Block-level volumes (iSCSI/FC LUN).
2. Interoperability and unrestricted functionality:
Deduplication and compression features must operate seamlessly without introducing limitations or restrictions on simultaneous use of other critical functionalities, including but not limited to:
- Data replication.
- Thin provisioning.
- Backups.
- Volume cloning.
3. Inline deduplication and compression:
- Both deduplication and compression mechanisms must function in in-line mode, ensuring real-time data optimization without requiring post-processing.
- Deduplication must remain continuously active and cannot be disabled or bypassed by system administrators or any other means, ensuring consistent storage efficiency and data integrity.
- Storage solutions that rely on scheduled or job-based data reduction processes are not acceptable.
4. Licensing and support:
All features related to deduplication and compression must be:
- Fully licensed (if required by vendor provisions) and included in the offer, eliminating additional licensing costs for essential functionality.
- Supported by the storage system in its maximum configuration, ensuring scalability and compatibility across all deployment scenarios.
5. Performance and reliability considerations:
- The deduplication and compression mechanisms must not introduce significant latency or impact the system’s performance metrics, such as IOPS or throughput.
- Mechanisms should include built-in error detection and correction to maintain data integrity during deduplication and compression processes.
6. Management and monitoring:
The system must provide a dedicated interface or tools for monitoring deduplication and compression efficiency, including:
- Space savings metrics.
- Real-time and historical performance impacts.
- Detailed logs of deduplication and compression activities.
Snapshot requirements:
1. General functionality:
- The system must support snapshot functionality at a minimum for block-level volumes (LUNs), ensuring operational flexibility.
- The snapshot functionality must be applicable to both LUNs and other supported volumes without imposing restrictions on the simultaneous use of other critical system functions, including replication, backups, and cloning.
2. Snapshot quantity and retention:
- The system must provide the ability to create and manage a minimum of 365 snapshots per shared volume, supporting long-term operational and recovery needs.
- Snapshots must be configurable with retention policies to optimize storage space and align with data governance requirements.
3. Performance efficiency:
- The implementation of snapshots must not degrade overall system performance, regardless of the number of active snapshots or system workload.
- The system must include optimization mechanisms, such as metadata indexing and intelligent snapshot scheduling, to minimize latency and maintain high performance.
4. Space efficiency:
- Snapshot functionality must employ a cost-effective approach by storing only the delta (changes) from the original data. This ensures minimal storage consumption while preserving full data access and recovery capabilities.
5. Integration with storage QoS:
- The system must support performance monitoring and prioritization mechanisms for snapshots, enabling administrators to enforce Storage QoS (Quality of Service) policies at both the volume and LUN levels.
- These QoS policies should dynamically allocate resources to prioritize performance-critical snapshots, ensuring minimal impact on other operations.
6. Advanced features:
Snapshots must support:
- Application-consistent snapshots, ensuring data integrity for workloads such as databases and virtualized environments.
- Writable snapshots, allowing clones to be created for development, testing, or analytics without affecting the production environment.
Snapshots must be compatible with data replication workflows, ensuring consistent replication of both primary data and snapshot states across systems.
7. Monitoring and reporting:
- The system must include a dedicated interface or tools for managing, monitoring, and reporting on snapshot performance, space utilization, and recovery operations.
- Real-time alerts and historical logs must be available for visibility into snapshot performance and potential bottlenecks.
Encryption requirements:
1. Encryption standard:
- The solution must support encryption of all stored data using a minimum of the AES-256 algorithm or a stronger industry-standard encryption algorithm, ensuring compliance with modern security and regulatory standards.
2. Scope of encryption:
- Encryption must be applied to all drives, NVMe, and flash storage within the device, covering the entire data storage ecosystem.
- Encryption must extend to data at rest across all volumes, snapshots, backups, and metadata associated with the system.
3. Performance integrity:
- Encryption functionality must operate with no measurable impact on system performance, ensuring IOPS, throughput, and latency metrics remain consistent with non-encrypted operations.
- The system must leverage hardware-accelerated encryption or equivalent technologies to maintain optimal performance during data encryption and decryption processes.
4. Key management:
- The solution must generate encryption keys using a secure hardware-based random number generator, ensuring keys are robust and resistant to attacks.
- Encryption keys must be securely stored on the equipment, leveraging a dedicated hardware security module (HSM) or equivalent secure enclave to isolate keys from unauthorized access.
- The system must ensure that data stored on drives/NVMe/flash cannot be accessed if the storage media is removed from the device or if the device itself is compromised.
5. Key backup and recovery:
- The system must include mechanisms for secure backup and recovery of encryption keys, supporting integration with external key management systems (KMS) compliant with KMIP (Key Management Interoperability Protocol) standards.
- Key rotation and lifecycle management should be automated and configurable to align with organizational policies and compliance requirements.
6. Encryption for replication and snapshots:
- The encryption functionality must extend to replicated data and snapshots, ensuring consistency in encryption across all replicated sites or volumes.
- Encryption must not disrupt or degrade replication workflows, including synchronous and asynchronous modes.
Monitoring requirements:
1. Analytical platform or portal:
- The system must include a robust analytical platform or virtual machine (VM) accessible via a web browser-based portal.
- The platform must provide an intuitive, user-friendly interface with interactive dashboards for data visualization and management.
2. Log collection and reporting:
The platform must automatically collect and analyze logs from the device and present them as customizable graphs, reports, and alerts, covering the following:
2.1. Storage utilization:
- Real-time and historical monitoring of used space.
- Display of the data reduction indicator, accounting for deduplication and compression (excluding thin provisioning, if applicable).
- Granular visibility at both the global device level and the local LUN level.
2.2. Space growth prediction:
- Advanced forecasting tools for predicting space growth, factoring in deduplication, compression, and provisioning trends.
- Tools for future expansion analysis, including recommendations for scaling.
3. Component monitoring:
The system must include an application or hardware-based monitoring solution to oversee and report detailed events for the following physical and logical components:
- Physical components: controllers, drives, ports, power supplies, and network interfaces.
- Logical components: volumes, LUNs, replication processes, deduplication, and compression algorithms.
4. Performance monitoring:
The portal must provide minimum:
- Real-time and historical performance metrics for individual resources.
- Key parameters to monitor: Latency, Read and Write IOPS, Bandwidth.
Performance data must be available at both the global system level and the LUN level.
5. Storage QoS and prioritization:
- The system must include a performance monitoring and prioritization mechanism for Storage QoS, configurable at both the volume and LUN levels.
- QoS metrics should be adjustable in real-time to meet dynamic workload demands.
6. Reporting and alerting:
The portal must provide comprehensive reporting capabilities, including at least:
- Capacity reports: current usage, available space, and forecasted capacity needs.
- Performance reports: historical trends and real-time analytics of system performance.
- Future space predictions: automated simulations for capacity increases based on application type and workload.
- Event logs: authorization attempts, executed commands, and system alerts for security and operational events.
- Technical support logs: level of support received, resolution times, and incident history.
7. Operational monitoring:
- Snapshot and replication status: display the real-time status of operations such as snapshots, synchronous/asynchronous replication, and recovery tasks.
- Threat alerts: warnings related to system integrity, user activity, or misconfigurations.
- Optimization insights: recommendations for system performance improvement, resource reallocation, or energy efficiency.
8. Configuration verification and upgrades:
- The platform must include an algorithm for verifying configuration correctness and compatibility with potential device or cluster upgrades.
9. Simulation and optimization:
- The platform must enable capacity simulation tools to project storage needs based on application types and expected workloads.
- Display real-time system consumption metrics with actionable optimization guidelines for improving performance and efficiency.
NICs included per controller:
Min. 1 x 1GE for management;
Min. 2 x 32G FC SFP28(850nm SFP+ SR MM module included) for data transfer;
Min. 2 x 32G FC dedicated for replication (metro cluster).
Supported operating environments:
Microsoft Windows Server;
Red Hat Enterprise Linux;
VMware (VMware ESXi);
Power supplies included:
The system must include a minimum of two (2) hot-swappable (hot-plug) Power Supply Units (PSUs).
The PSUs must support at least 1+1 redundancy, ensuring continuous operation in case of failure of one PSU.
Power cables included must meet the following specifications:
- Type: IEC C13 to C14.
- Minimum length: 0.6 meters (24 inches).
Cerințe obligatorii pentru prestarea serviciilor de punere în funcțiune, a garanției și a serviciilor de suport (deservire și mentenanță) a bunurilor - conform Anexei la Anunțul de participare.
Toate licențele necesare (dacă se aplică conform termenilor și condițiilor producătorului) pentru caracteristicile platformei/portalului de monitorizare (analitică) și software-ului/firmware-ului specific sistemului de stocare, inclusiv actualizările/patch-urile periodice, trebuie să fie incluse în ofertă și furnizate pe o bază perpetuă - valabile obligatoriu pentru durata integrală de viață a sistemului de stocare.
Termeni și condiții:
Toate cerințele sunt minime și obligatorii;
O cerință nu trebuie să limiteze o altă cerință;
Toate componentele trebuie să fie actuale și să nu fie promovate ca EOS (sfârșitul vânzării/suportului) / EOL (sfârșitul duratei de viață);
Extinderea memoriei (ram) și a capacității de stocare nu trebuie să includă limitări hardware sau software.
Information about customer
Title
Fiscal code/IDNO
Address
2012, MOLDOVA, mun.Chişinău, mun.Chişinău, str. Puskin, 42
Web site
---
The contact person
Purchase data
Date created
26 Feb 2025, 15:40
Date modified
27 Feb 2025, 9:22
Estimated value (without VAT)
17 890 453,94 MDL
The minimum downward of the price
178 904,53 MDL
Achizitii.md ID
21372316
MTender ID
Type of procedure
Open tender
Award criteria
The lowest price
Delivery address
2012, MOLDOVA, mun.Chişinău, mun.Chişinău, str. Puskin, 42
Contract period
7 Apr 2025 15:56 - 30 Dec 2025 16:02
List of positions
1)
Title
Quantity: 4.0
Unit of measurement: Bucata
Subscription settings saved.
Remember, you can always go back to the Subscriptions section and make changes to the frequency of receiving letters, delete or add categories and customers.
Вы уже подписаны на данный CPV код
Insufficient funds
You do not have enough funds in your account to set up a subscription. Top up your account, to continue.
Subscription Setup
Subscribe to daily email notifications according to selected CPV and/or IDNO categories for the period:
The subscription cost is 10 MDL with VAT per month.
View Regulations.
Documents of the procurement procedure
Anexe la documentatia standard.docx
Bidding Documents
Anexe la documentatia standard.docx
26.02.25 16:06
Anunt de participare.signed.pdf
Anunt de participare.signed.pdf
Bidding Documents
Anunt de participare.signed.pdf
26.02.25 16:06
Anexa la Anunțul de participare.docx
Bidding Documents
Anexa la Anunțul de participare.docx
26.02.25 16:06
Anexe la documentatia standard.signed.pdf
Anexe la documentatia standard.signed.pdf
Bidding Documents
Anexe la documentatia standard.signed.pdf
26.02.25 16:06
Anexa nr. 24 Servere si sisteme.signed.pdf
Anexa nr. 24 Servere si sisteme.signed.pdf
Bidding Documents
Anexa nr. 24 Servere si sisteme.signed.pdf
26.02.25 16:06
Anexa la Anunțul de participare.signed.pdf
Anexa la Anunțul de participare.signed.pdf
Bidding Documents
Anexa la Anunțul de participare.signed.pdf
26.02.25 16:06
The offers of the participants are available below, you can view the documents for the offers by clicking on the folder icon.
Based on the Working Group Decision, the selection of a winner requires:
1) Choose winner by clicking the button "Winner.”
2) Отправить в течении 3 дней на почту AAP bap@tender.gov.md отсканированное решение рабочей группы.
4) After choosing the winner, press the button: "Confirm"..
Qualification
№
Participant(s) name(s)
Normalized price
Status
1
Participant(s) name(s):
BTS PRO
Normalized price:
10 500 000 MDL
Status:
Cancelled
Other grounds for rejecting the offer
06.06.25 11:02
Reason: Other grounds for rejecting the offer
Qualification documents
informarea oe pe platforma - deschiderea ofertelor.pdf
ID: d52a55bc-6228-4ff7-b3bb-247545cdd74c
Evaluation Reports
6.06.25 11:02
Documents provided with the proposal
duae_btssigned.pdf
ID: 1708fda9-63e0-45c5-ba93-0836ce42c025
Eligibility documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:14
declaratiereparareaechipamentelorsigned.pdf
ID: 628ba4b1-1bee-4d69-96e3-c26fe6716ca0
Eligibility documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:14
garantiedeparticipareaspsignedsigned.pdf
ID: 880a3e37-7d2e-4998-9a4a-32e6fb4d5ea4
Documents of submission
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:14
certificat_deee_ba_btssigned.pdf
ID: a69b56e7-3828-4b28-a942-9c91de4e2244
Eligibility documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:14
performance_repo_600tbsigned.pdf
ID: 185bc519-4885-468f-90c9-77530d85cb2f
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
performance_repo_200tbsigned.pdf
ID: 1d94ccb4-93ac-49e4-b332-d022458e408f
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
oferta_bts_2signed.pdf
ID: 210bac2e-f7f2-443d-8c22-a42982ded128
Financial proposal
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
declaratiesuport_mentenantasigned.pdf
ID: 68a710f3-29aa-491c-8fca-202fd5891ba1
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
caziersigned20250312.pdf
ID: 700ab5ce-d67b-4f51-a9c1-7a5561f1e236
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
specialisti_implementaresigned.pdf
ID: 755d23d3-1875-4c7c-b3de-491cc7d77f81
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
netapp_specialistisigned.pdf
ID: 8ccc83a5-f5f8-4785-9bf0-b0f526048dfe
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
fisc_250327signed20250327.pdf
ID: 9017e5c4-09b2-4e7f-b487-98840ce3f4a7
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
bts_setdoc2025signed.pdf
ID: 9ac9d793-8522-44f2-86bd-15b87bf51162
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
datasheetcsigned.pdf
ID: 9c84d2e9-5e8b-401e-aee3-d9a7f04cc63b
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
maf_partner_isosigned.pdf
ID: ac4250d1-1d38-4625-9ac0-d09e4f378f0d
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
procuri_bts_2025signedsigned.pdf
ID: c4f81f93-e72e-4e77-9bea-91ff8b6c4917
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
anexalaanunțuldeparticiparesemnat.pdf
ID: de083871-ea03-405c-abec-7c1797f96995
Qualification documents
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:50
Opening date:
20.03.25 14:16
2
Participant(s) name(s):
PRIDE SYSTEM
Normalized price:
11 999 999 MDL
Status:
Cancelled
Other grounds for rejecting the offer
29.07.25 10:49
Reason: Other grounds for rejecting the offer
Qualification documents
informarea oe pe platforma - deschiderea ofertelor.pdf
ID: 7b7e6b62-dc98-4e47-a955-53c598c848f3
Evaluation Reports
29.07.25 10:49
Documents provided with the proposal
03 . specificatii de pret - anexa 23.signed.pdf
03 . specificatii de pret - anexa 23.signed.pdf
ID: 061ff566-8009-4194-aba5-1d54588980a1
Financial proposal
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
15.5. huawei_md_asp_lot_4_v001_min_sizing_16k_100%_summary.signed.pdf
15.5. huawei_md_asp_lot_4_v001_min_sizing_16k_100%_summary.signed.pdf
ID: 0a1d85b4-5d17-47ea-a2fe-67a3e1dd237c
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
05. declaratie privind confirmarea identitatii beneficiarilor efectivi.signed.pdf
05. declaratie privind confirmarea identitatii beneficiarilor efectivi.signed.pdf
ID: 0acfe21c-af76-4c03-beb5-3fdc18e683d0
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
10. declaratie termen de intretinere si reparatie echipamente.signed.pdf
10. declaratie termen de intretinere si reparatie echipamente.signed.pdf
ID: 1a0ac955-f38e-427d-984d-b2ecb42b2472
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
08.2. declaratii service centru.signed.pdf
08.2. declaratii service centru.signed.pdf
ID: 244108f2-39e0-4add-ac12-20cc9180f6ed
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
15.4. huawei_md_asp_lot_4_v001_min_sizing_16k_100%.signed.pdf
15.4. huawei_md_asp_lot_4_v001_min_sizing_16k_100%.signed.pdf
ID: 27ba7f23-b39b-4f82-a4c4-f101b8d02fb8
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
16. livrare solutie stocare date # 6.signed.pdf
16. livrare solutie stocare date # 6.signed.pdf
ID: 2a232cd3-0bf6-419d-87b6-d13bef1db058
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
15.1. cisco_ucs_c220_m7_rack_server_datasheet.signed.pdf
15.1. cisco_ucs_c220_m7_rack_server_datasheet.signed.pdf
ID: 3d25da44-ccac-463b-8140-9937e37173de
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
16. livrare servere # 1.signed.pdf
16. livrare servere # 1.signed.pdf
ID: 3eefe1ad-008c-40fc-bc13-2973abc1afbe
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
16. livrare solutie stocare date # 5.signed.pdf
16. livrare solutie stocare date # 5.signed.pdf
ID: 40c8a2f7-56dd-466d-b49b-2ba6a9712484
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
08.1. declaratii service centru.signed.pdf
08.1. declaratii service centru.signed.pdf
ID: 51aaafb6-77eb-48b5-8a15-848d3bc25fc0
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
16. livrare solutie stocare date # 4.signed.pdf
16. livrare solutie stocare date # 4.signed.pdf
ID: 5a65c566-a471-464e-a718-bb92f7e26c48
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
16. anexa 12 - lista principalelor livrari (3 ani).signed.pdf
16. anexa 12 - lista principalelor livrari (3 ani).signed.pdf
ID: 5ba4704f-e58e-4aa0-bbd1-d6a6c04c4582
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
16. livrare servere # 3.signed.pdf
16. livrare servere # 3.signed.pdf
ID: 635992b7-6574-4a6e-b63b-40c4d3b0c59d
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
16. livrare servere # 2.signed.pdf
16. livrare servere # 2.signed.pdf
ID: 694d69e8-b0ac-44bb-a024-f0edc1bcb0eb
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
09. declaratie detinere sistem de inregistrare apeluri.signed.pdf
09. declaratie detinere sistem de inregistrare apeluri.signed.pdf
ID: 6d77b274-2940-46b4-884c-5fd17b4e6488
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
15.6. huawei_oceanstor_dorado_all-flash_storage_systems_datasheet.signed.pdf
15.6. huawei_oceanstor_dorado_all-flash_storage_systems_datasheet.signed.pdf
ID: 740ba7d2-3eb0-4664-b68e-a2c2724a4997
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
15.2. cisco_ucs_c240_m7_rack_server_datasheet.signed.pdf
15.2. cisco_ucs_c240_m7_rack_server_datasheet.signed.pdf
ID: 7504d4de-3c36-4a66-b084-828179da1b83
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
11. declaratie conditii de garantie.signed.pdf
11. declaratie conditii de garantie.signed.pdf
ID: 7d935c1f-e38b-4df2-9854-64c2437c13de
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
15.3. huawei_md_asp_lot_3_v001_min_sizing_16k_100%.signed.pdf
15.3. huawei_md_asp_lot_3_v001_min_sizing_16k_100%.signed.pdf
ID: 85676509-eb4a-4018-9b1e-0c5345f6288c
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
07. anexa 8 - declaratie valabilitate oferta.signed.pdf
07. anexa 8 - declaratie valabilitate oferta.signed.pdf
ID: 9b407338-559a-4948-a270-183f2d1a68ed
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
19. copia cazierului judiciar al persoanei juridice.signed.pdf
19. copia cazierului judiciar al persoanei juridice.signed.pdf
ID: a4c19c3f-7710-4f09-b960-3a5f7162c731
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
17. anexa nr. 14 - personalul de specialitate.signed.pdf
17. anexa nr. 14 - personalul de specialitate.signed.pdf
ID: af3272b1-1703-4561-9761-0639a9e137da
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
04. confirmare plata (garantie bancara 2%).signed.pdf
04. confirmare plata (garantie bancara 2%).signed.pdf
ID: b6996c59-9ab8-4fb7-b0a9-3e32efc46723
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
12. iso certificat 27001-2013.signed.pdf
12. iso certificat 27001-2013.signed.pdf
ID: c157b336-7796-4aa6-9e7d-50e7067c3f88
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
13. iso certificat 9001-2015.signed.pdf
13. iso certificat 9001-2015.signed.pdf
ID: e09712a5-2eff-4630-8171-265deb0adfba
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
02 . specificatii tehnice - anexa 22.signed.pdf
02 . specificatii tehnice - anexa 22.signed.pdf
ID: e79fd6f3-11f2-40af-a62d-bd0aeab6cf50
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
14. confirmare producator eee (lista producatorilor).signed.pdf
14. confirmare producator eee (lista producatorilor).signed.pdf
ID: eb357a92-c393-40f7-a5f9-b07d8822516e
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
15.3. huawei_md_asp_lot_3_v001_min_sizing_16k_100%_summary.signed.pdf
15.3. huawei_md_asp_lot_3_v001_min_sizing_16k_100%_summary.signed.pdf
ID: f0ae7d71-afcc-42aa-9774-f0df1fd890e8
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
06. anexa 7 - cerere de participare.signed.pdf
06. anexa 7 - cerere de participare.signed.pdf
ID: fb8568d2-a54b-4c5b-8462-4d31d64fa479
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 09:15
Opening date:
6.06.25 11:02
3
Participant(s) name(s):
S&T Mold
Normalized price:
15 000 000 MDL
Status:
Cancelled
Other grounds for rejecting the offer
14.08.25 16:51
Reason: Other grounds for rejecting the offer
Qualification documents
informarea oe pe platforma - deschiderea ofertelor.pdf
ID: 492151bb-78ab-480f-a008-6d69cf1eabd2
Evaluation Reports
14.08.25 16:51
Documents provided with the proposal
cerere de participare, anexa 7.signed.pdf
cerere de participare, anexa 7.signed.pdf
ID: 015d719e-1295-4964-b152-7d27c1be2468
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
declaratie de garantie_asp.signed.pdf
declaratie de garantie_asp.signed.pdf
ID: 0a78c07a-c139-4c0f-b106-f9e554906ab5
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
declaratie de îndeplinire a cerintelor obligatorii_asp.signed.pdf
declaratie de îndeplinire a cerintelor obligatorii_asp.signed.pdf
ID: 196d2f3f-df4e-47fd-b892-6a2f9c2bdaad
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
d1_hpe alletra storage mp b10000 data sheet-psn1014727563czen.signed.pdf
d1_hpe alletra storage mp b10000 data sheet-psn1014727563czen.signed.pdf
ID: 1deb7d37-381a-4fa1-901e-bbc7fbd7e648
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
2025_extras din registrul de stat al persoanelor juridice.signed.pdf
2025_extras din registrul de stat al persoanelor juridice.signed.pdf
ID: 2071c2f3-6c2d-49fa-ae39-8da7a3317b3c
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
d3_hpe proliant dl380 gen11 data sheet-psn1014696069sgen.signed.pdf
d3_hpe proliant dl380 gen11 data sheet-psn1014696069sgen.signed.pdf
ID: 220be1f9-b99d-42b3-8255-ff5aab35dc3d
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
hpe alletra storage mp b10000 sizing - l4.signed.pdf
hpe alletra storage mp b10000 sizing - l4.signed.pdf
ID: 23bcdfc9-115d-42b6-bbf7-2c40fb02ada6
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
declaratia privind valabilitatea ofertei, anexa 8.signed.pdf
declaratia privind valabilitatea ofertei, anexa 8.signed.pdf
ID: 2673f740-99ab-4084-96f9-06ceedba0940
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
hpe maf_s&t mold srl_additional.signed.pdf
hpe maf_s&t mold srl_additional.signed.pdf
ID: 31a56d43-46cb-4f22-8658-156d9b43c3b2
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
specificatii de pret, anexa 23.signed.pdf
specificatii de pret, anexa 23.signed.pdf
ID: 425f5a43-7825-455f-8638-add2620d0165
Financial proposal
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
cazier juridic_17.05.2025_snt mold.signed.pdf
cazier juridic_17.05.2025_snt mold.signed.pdf
ID: 4a9867c5-6b5e-4e13-9ee5-118aff2a0d16
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
d2_hpe proliant dl360 gen11 data sheet-psn1014696065usen.signed.pdf
d2_hpe proliant dl360 gen11 data sheet-psn1014696065usen.signed.pdf
ID: 53420b88-8581-492b-aec0-e8183d9c7717
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
hpe alletra storage mp b10000 sizing - l3.signed.pdf
hpe alletra storage mp b10000 sizing - l3.signed.pdf
ID: 5c77eeb5-86d0-4636-b150-7f99fd7c3345
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
hpe certificate - partner ready delivery.signed.pdf
hpe certificate - partner ready delivery.signed.pdf
ID: 5dc3d616-754d-4f01-a54d-258540b99ab2
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
declaratie privind detinerea sistemului de înregistrare a apelurilor.signed.pdf
declaratie privind detinerea sistemului de înregistrare a apelurilor.signed.pdf
ID: 74df3dc9-247c-40a2-9760-60185146e094
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
op garantie asp 18.03.2025.signed.pdf
op garantie asp 18.03.2025.signed.pdf
ID: 788373cb-f373-4870-ac14-fdd172059aed
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
procura_cojocari_andrei_2025.signed.pdf
procura_cojocari_andrei_2025.signed.pdf
ID: 83ee8666-3c9a-430d-ba9a-ae8853d109ed
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:55
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
declaratie privind detinerea centrului de deservire.signed.pdf
declaratie privind detinerea centrului de deservire.signed.pdf
ID: 8d0d6452-944f-456c-921a-4c78b32c3413
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
confirmare (eee).signed.signed.pdf
confirmare (eee).signed.signed.pdf
ID: 98f658de-2e5c-4a29-a950-798a18e12a16
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
formular1 anexa 22.signed.pdf
formular1 anexa 22.signed.pdf
ID: ad4caf84-5035-42ce-8380-9fe2ed5588d6
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
declaratie privind personalul de specialitate_ anexa 14.signed.pdf
declaratie privind personalul de specialitate_ anexa 14.signed.pdf
ID: b8810d38-40e3-4da3-ba52-7397a0c913e8
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
certificat privind lipsa restantelor_sfs_snt mold.signed.pdf
certificat privind lipsa restantelor_sfs_snt mold.signed.pdf
ID: bea5c746-e5fe-4923-8503-9788c0297151
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
specificatii tehnice.signed.pdf
specificatii tehnice.signed.pdf
ID: d96024fc-bae6-4064-8273-04cc59a41b1a
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
declaratie privind lista principalelor livrari,prestari_anexa 12.signed.pdf
declaratie privind lista principalelor livrari,prestari_anexa 12.signed.pdf
ID: e5fb777c-1865-452d-a12d-f4f424e010f2
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:50
Opening date:
29.07.25 10:49
4
Participant(s) name(s):
I.C.S. Reliable Solutions Distributor S.R.L.
Normalized price:
15 550 000 MDL
Status:
In consideration
Reason: Not indicated
Qualification documents
Documents folder missing
Documents provided with the proposal
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
14. îcs rsd srl confirmare producator eee (lista producatorilor).signed.pdf
14. îcs rsd srl confirmare producator eee (lista producatorilor).signed.pdf
ID: 3071fb2b-2465-4b48-b41d-b6e3631eea62
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
20. certificat privind lipsa restantelor.signed.pdf
20. certificat privind lipsa restantelor.signed.pdf
ID: 44630728-88c3-4307-b696-e8209cf42324
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
8. service centru local autorizat.signed.pdf
8. service centru local autorizat.signed.pdf
ID: 4a1f8d66-321c-40f5-99dd-75dfcfea8a3b
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
3. specificații de preț.signed.pdf
3. specificații de preț.signed.pdf
ID: 5e983a37-a988-4d3f-8054-e26fa5f386b5
Financial proposal
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
6. cerere de participare.signed.pdf
6. cerere de participare.signed.pdf
ID: 609ae704-3ee5-4d0a-bff7-43b3f04c90a0
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
10. asigurarea echipamentului livrat cu piese de schimb și componente pe durata minimă de 5 ani de exploatare.signed.pdf
10. asigurarea echipamentului livrat cu piese de schimb și componente pe durata minimă de 5 ani de exploatare.signed.pdf
ID: 63682134-3120-4cb8-afc2-bed2d3242698
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
14. îcs rsd srl confirmarea înscrierii în lista producătorilor de ambalaje.signed.pdf
14. îcs rsd srl confirmarea înscrierii în lista producătorilor de ambalaje.signed.pdf
ID: 65be6f7f-c930-42ca-9165-d3ae0ec60348
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
18. extras din registrul de stat al persoanelor juridice (17).signed.pdf
18. extras din registrul de stat al persoanelor juridice (17).signed.pdf
ID: 6678f829-2960-426f-bbe8-cd9fc3b4af6b
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
7. valabilitatea ofertei.signed.pdf
7. valabilitatea ofertei.signed.pdf
ID: 6c73af86-9f74-4b6a-9614-afe264cc66d2
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
11. îndeplinirea de către furnizor a cerințelor obligatorii pentru prestarea serviciilor.signed.pdf
11. îndeplinirea de către furnizor a cerințelor obligatorii pentru prestarea serviciilor.signed.pdf
ID: 6d302bdf-8ff5-49bf-8dbf-da62a659f887
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
4. garanția pentru ofertă 2%.signed.pdf
4. garanția pentru ofertă 2%.signed.pdf
ID: 73f46dc1-9af1-4e6c-982b-f19126326f41
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
21. anexa nr. 1 - matrice conformitate storage.signed.pdf
21. anexa nr. 1 - matrice conformitate storage.signed.pdf
ID: 957293a1-0040-4b38-ad58-51b21b6ab1a7
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
9. deținerea sistemului de înregistrare a apelurilor de suport și mentenanță.signed.pdf
9. deținerea sistemului de înregistrare a apelurilor de suport și mentenanță.signed.pdf
ID: 9e19131f-7a0d-4876-b764-89afa1a61fbe
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
2. specificații tehnice.signed.pdf
2. specificații tehnice.signed.pdf
ID: b0621a6b-aa37-4b0b-b505-b4ae872dd08b
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
19. cazier judiciar.signed.pdf
19. cazier judiciar.signed.pdf
ID: d36fcbf1-9c7a-4f0a-9b06-3f7a72d136b9
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
14. îcs rsd srl confirmarea înscrierii în lista producătorilor de ba.signed.pdf
14. îcs rsd srl confirmarea înscrierii în lista producătorilor de ba.signed.pdf
ID: ddb5444d-2dfe-4aa1-9f68-c28724a63d4d
Qualification documents
MSIGN
Date of download:
19.03.25 08:57
Opening date:
14.08.25 16:51
The history of the auction
View auction
Lotul nr. 3 Enterprise Storage (Sisteme de stocare) tip 1(SAS SSD)
Date:
27 Feb 2025, 13:58
Question's name:
Justificarea utilizării SAS în locul NVMe – tehnologie depășită pentru sisteme de stocare enterprise moderne
Question:
Documentația specifică utilizarea exclusivă a unităților de stocare bazate pe interfața SAS (Serial Attached SCSI), în ciuda faptului că această tehnologie este considerată depășită în comparație cu standardul NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express). SAS are un număr semnificativ mai mare de limitări tehnice față de NVMe, inclusiv latență mai mare, rată de transfer inferioară și un număr semnificativ mai mic de cozi de comandă, ceea ce duce la performanță mai slabă în aplicații cu IOPS ridicat.
Având în vedere că NVMe oferă multiple avantaje tehnice, inclusiv o scalabilitate superioară, latență redusă și performanță mult mai mare, solicităm modificarea cerințelor tehnice pentru a schimba tehnologia SAS pe NVMe.
Answer (5 Mar 2025, 11:03):
Referitor la alegerea interfeței SAS SSD în detrimentul NVMe pentru sistemele de stocare din Lotul nr. 3, oferim următoarele precizări:
1. Justificarea utilizării SAS SSD în această achiziție
Cerința pentru Enterprise-grade SAS SSDs a fost stabilită pentru a îndeplini strict necesitățile Autorității contractante și cerințele operaționale și arhitecturale specifice ale infrastructurii existente, având în vedere următoarele aspecte:
• Compatibilitate și integrare
Sistemele de stocare vizate trebuie să fie compatibile cu platformele și soluțiile existente, care sunt optimizate pentru medii bazate pe SAS SSD. Adoptarea exclusivă a NVMe ar putea necesita modificări semnificative ale infrastructurii și ar putea impune costuri suplimentare pentru compatibilitatea hardware și software.
• Fiabilitate și scalabilitate
În centrele de date enterprise, SAS SSD este preferat datorită mecanismelor avansate de gestionare a erorilor, redundanței și fiabilității ridicate. De asemenea, SAS oferă scalabilitate superioară pentru soluții cu numeroase unități de stocare, permițând conectivitate eficientă prin expandoare SAS fără a necesita controlere suplimentare, ceea ce este critic pentru disponibilitatea continuă a serviciilor.
• Performanță adecvată pentru scenariul de utilizare
Deși NVMe oferă performanță superioară în aplicații cu IOPS foarte ridicat, analiza cerințelor operaționale a demonstrat că SAS SSD satisface pe deplin nevoile actuale de stocare, oferind un echilibru între viteză, fiabilitate și costuri. De asemenea, modelele avansate de SAS SSD, inclusiv cele eTLC, asigură performanțe competitive - din considerente de raport cost-eficiență, fără a compromite stabilitatea sistemului.
2. Impactul modificării cerințelor la NVMe
• Ofertele bazate exclusiv pe NVMe ar necesita modificarea arhitecturii întregului sistem de stocare, inclusiv controlere compatibile NVMe, modificarea interconectivității și posibile ajustări la nivel de software.
• Sistemele NVMe sunt mai puțin potrivite pentru scenarii cu cerințe ridicate de disponibilitate și protecție a datelor în arhitecturi tradiționale de stocare SAN.
• Costurile asociate implementării unei infrastructuri full-NVMe ar putea fi semnificativ mai mari, ceea ce ar putea reduce eficiența utilizării fondurilor publice, fără un beneficiu clar raportat la cerințele operaționale curente.
Astfel, având în vedere criteriile care au stat la etapa de planificare și elaborare a cerințelor de fiabilitate, compatibilitate și eficiență operațională, utilizarea Enterprise-grade SAS SSD rămâne justificată pentru Lotul nr. 3. Cerințele tehnice stabilite nu exclud viitoare evoluții tehnologice, însă în contextul actual, alegerea SAS SSD asigură maximizarea compatibilității cu infrastructura existentă, minimizarea costurilor suplimentare și garantarea stabilității sistemului.
Lotul nr. 3 Enterprise Storage (Sisteme de stocare) tip 1(SAS SSD)
Date:
27 Feb 2025, 14:02
Question's name:
Justificarea utilizării exclusiv a tehnologiei TLC/eTLC pentru SSD-uri – risc major asupra continuității registrelor critice ale ASP
Question:
În specificațiile tehnice se solicită utilizarea exclusivă a SSD-urilor bazate pe tehnologia TLC (Triple-Level Cell) sau eTLC (Enhanced TLC), fără a permite alternative mai fiabile și performante precum MLC (Multi-Level Cell) sau SLC (Single-Level Cell). TLC este cunoscută ca fiind cea mai slabă tehnologie de stocare NAND în termeni de durabilitate și fiabilitate, având un număr semnificativ mai mic de cicluri de scriere/ștergere comparativ cu MLC și SLC.
Pentru un sistem critic, precum cel destinat Agenției Servicii Publice (ASP), care gestionează registre fundamentale ale statului (evidența populației, cadastru, acte oficiale etc.), utilizarea SSD-urilor TLC reprezintă un risc inacceptabil pentru continuitatea operațională și integritatea datelor. În condiții de utilizare intensivă, SSD-urile bazate pe TLC se degradează rapid, necesitând înlocuire frecventă și expunând datele critice ale statului la riscul de pierdere sau corupere.
În plus, având în vedere că acest sistem este achiziționat din fonduri publice, selecția unei tehnologii inferioare poate duce la prejudicii semnificative atât prin costuri de mentenanță ridicate (înlocuiri frecvente), cât și prin eventuale pierderi de date.
Solicităm:
1. Excluderea TLC/eTLC ca tehnologie obligatorie și introducerea posibilității de utilizare a MLC sau SLC, care oferă o durată de viață de până la 30 de ori mai mare și fiabilitate superioară.
2. Modificarea cerinței astfel încât să se permită utilizarea SSD-urilor NVMe bazate pe MLC/SLC, asigurând astfel un sistem optim pentru aplicațiile critice guvernamentale.
Nerespectarea acestor ajustări crește semnificativ riscul ca ASP să fie afectată de indisponibilități frecvente, generând pierderi economice și vulnerabilități critice pentru infrastructura digitală națională.
Answer (5 Mar 2025, 11:06):
Stimate solicitant,
Vă mulțumim pentru solicitarea de clarificare referitoare la tehnologia SSD indicată în cadrul Lotului nr. 3 – Enterprise Storage. Dorim să oferim următoarele precizări privind alegerea TLC/eTLC și excluderea altor tehnologii NAND precum MLC/SLC:
1. Justificarea utilizării TLC/eTLC în această achiziție
Cerințele tehnice au fost stabilite ținând cont de raportul optim între cost, performanță și durabilitate pentru sistemele de stocare Enterprise destinate infrastructurii Agenției Servicii Publice (ASP).
• Fiabilitate dovedită în medii Enterprise
o TLC și eTLC sunt tehnologii optimizate pentru centre de date și medii critice, fiind utilizate pe scară largă în sisteme de stocare Enterprise de la producători de renume.
o SSD-urile SAS TLC/eTLC includ algoritmi avansați de wear-leveling și over-provisioning, ceea ce asigură o durată de viață extinsă și performanță constantă.
o Producătorii de soluții Enterprise integrează mecanisme de redundanță și protecție a datelor la nivel de firmware și controler, minimizând riscul degradării premature.
• Compatibilitate și optimizare pentru infrastructura existentă
o Alegerea SSD-urilor TLC/eTLC a fost corelată cu specificațiile hardware/software pentru a asigura coerență, stabilitate și compatibilitate pe termen lung.
o SSD-urile bazate pe MLC și SLC sunt semnificativ mai costisitoare și rareori utilizate în medii Enterprise moderne, fiind mai potrivite pentru aplicații specializate decât pentru soluții de stocare scalabile.
2. Considerente privind durabilitatea și costurile
• SSD-urile Enterprise SAS TLC/eTLC includ măsuri avansate de durabilitate, iar estimările de viață sunt aliniate cu ciclul de utilizare al sistemului preconizat spre achiziționare.
• În practică, fiabilitatea unui SSD depinde mai mult de algoritmii de gestionare a uzurii (wear-leveling), over-provisioning și ECC, decât de tehnologia NAND utilizată.
• MLC și SLC nu oferă beneficii proporționale cu costul lor mai ridicat, iar necesitatea unui upgrade de infrastructură pentru a suporta NVMe ar implica costuri suplimentare semnificative.
3. Impactul modificării cerințelor
• Introducerea MLC/SLC sau NVMe ar necesita revizuirea specificațiilor sistemului de stocare, ceea ce ar putea genera incompatibilități hardware/software și creșteri semnificative ale costurilor.
• Sistemele NVMe necesită o arhitectură diferită, iar schimbarea tehnologiei SAS ar presupune modificări majore ale infrastructurii de stocare existente.
• Cheltuirea eficientă a banilor publici impune o evaluare cost-beneficiu riguroasă, iar utilizarea SSD-urilor TLC/eTLC oferă echilibrul optim între performanță, durabilitate și costuri pentru această aplicație.
Astfel, având în vedere criteriile de fiabilitate, compatibilitate și eficiență economică, cerința de utilizare a Enterprise-grade SAS SSDs cu tehnologie TLC/eTLC rămâne justificată pentru Lotul nr. 3. Această alegere nu va afecta continuitatea operațională și asigură respectarea cerințelor de performanță și stabilitate pentru ASP.
În concluzie, cerințele tehnice nu vor fi modificate, întrucât tehnologia TLC/eTLC implementată în SSD-urile Enterprise oferă fiabilitate dovedită, optimizare pentru infrastructura existentă și un raport adecvat între cost și performanță.
Lotul nr. 3 Enterprise Storage (Sisteme de stocare) tip 1(SAS SSD)
Date:
27 Feb 2025, 14:07
Question's name:
Metodologia de testare a performanței de 300.000 IOPS – cerință neconformă cu bunele practici
Question:
Specificarea actuală impune demonstrarea performanței de **minimum 300.000 IOPS** prin **teste efectuate cu IOmeter** pe soluția livrată. Această metodologie nu este conformă cu **bunele practici** în achizițiile publice și **nu reflectă standardele industriei**, din următoarele motive:
1. **Factori externi care influențează testele la fața locului** – Performanța unui sistem de stocare nu este determinată doar de echipamentul în sine, ci și de infrastructura în care este integrat (rețea, servere, configurația HBA/NIC, mediul software etc.). Testele realizate după livrare **nu pot fi considerate obiective**, deoarece performanța poate fi influențată de factori care nu țin de soluția de stocare în sine.
2. **Lipsa unui standard de testare uniform** – IOmeter este un instrument de testare flexibil, dar **nu garantează un rezultat unitar** între diferite implementări. Fără specificarea exactă a parametrilor de testare (queue depth, block size, read/write mix, numărul de conexiuni FC/iSCSI etc.), rezultatele pot varia semnificativ, ceea ce face imposibilă o evaluare comparativă corectă.
3. **Practică neuzuală în achizițiile de soluții enterprise** – Standardul industriei este ca performanța să fie **garanția producătorului**, confirmată prin **teste interne de laborator** realizate în condiții controlate. Vendorii de soluții de stocare enterprise furnizează **rapoarte oficiale** ale testelor realizate pe echipamente identice, validate de echipe de inginerie, ceea ce reprezintă **o metodologie mult mai fiabilă și predictibilă**.
Solicităm modificarea cerinței astfel încât **demonstrarea performanței să fie garantată de vendor**, prin:
- Furnizarea **rapoartelor interne oficiale** ale producătorului care certifică atingerea valorii minime de 300.000 IOPS în condiții similare de utilizare.
- Confirmarea și asumarea acestei performanțe printr-un **angajament scris** al producătorului privind respectarea indicatorilor de performanță specificați.
Această abordare asigură transparență și corectitudine în evaluarea performanței soluției și elimină riscul unor teste subiective influențate de factori externi.
Answer (5 Mar 2025, 11:05):
Stimate solicitant,
Vă mulțumim pentru solicitarea de clarificare privind metodologia de testare a performanței soluției de stocare în cadrul Lotului nr. 3 – Enterprise Storage (SAS SSD). În continuare, dorim să clarificăm raționamentul din spatele cerințelor impuse și să oferim detalii privind metodologia de validare a performanței.
1. Justificarea cerinței de testare cu IOmeter/FIO
Întrucât achiziția vizează un sistem critic pentru infrastructura IT guvernamentală, validarea performanței specificate este esențială pentru asigurarea respectării cerințelor operaționale și protecției investiției publice.
• Standardizarea procesului de verificare
o IOmeter și FIO sunt instrumente de referință utilizate pe scară largă în industrie pentru măsurarea IOPS, latenței și consistenței performanței în medii Enterprise.
o Cerințele de testare sunt clar definite în documentația publicată, incluzând parametri standardizați privind:
raportul de citire/scriere (70%/30%)
dimensiunea blocurilor (16 KB, 32 KB, 64 KB)
tipologia operațiunilor (random/sequential)
limita de latență (≤ 1 ms)
2. Răspuns la obiecțiile privind metodologia de testare
• Factori externi care influențează testele la fața locului
o Într-adevăr, performanța finală depinde de infrastructura completă, însă rezultatele testelor ce vor fi prezentate de către ofertanți vor fi efectuate într-un mediu controlat de către Producător, urmărind doar performanța sistemului de stocare ce va fi propus.
o Eventualele limitări externe (rețea, configurația serverelor) nu pot fi luate in considerare la etapa de evaluare documentară a ofertelor și rezultatele acestor testări, și nicidecum nu afectează cerința minimă de performanță a echipamentului de stocare.
• Lipsa unui standard de testare uniform
o Documentația achiziției definește parametri clari de testare, ceea ce elimină variabilitatea menționată.
o IOmeter și FIO permit configurarea exactă a testelor, asigurând reproducibilitatea rezultatelor și alinierea cu cerințele specificate.
Astfel, având în vedere necesitatea asigurării unei performanțe verificabile, cerința privind testarea soluției livrate cu IOmeter/FIO rămâne justificată și conformă cu bunele practici din industria de stocare Enterprise.
Prin urmare, metodologia de testare a performanței nu va fi modificată.
Lotul nr. 3 Enterprise Storage (Sisteme de stocare) tip 1(SAS SSD)
Date:
27 Feb 2025, 14:10
Question's name:
Clarificare privind cerința de cache – definiția termenului „per node”
Question:
În specificațiile tehnice, cerința referitoare la memoria cache prevede:
> *„If the storage system includes a cache mechanism, the system must provide a minimum of 512 GB of dedicated cache memory per node, ensuring high-speed data processing and optimal system performance.”*
Termenul „**per node**” necesită clarificare, deoarece nu este specificat dacă această valoare se referă la:
1. **Cache per sistem de stocare (per storage system)** – Adică valoarea totală minimă de 512 GB se aplică întregii soluții de stocare livrate.
2. **Cache per cluster** – Se referă la întregul cluster de stocare (format din mai multe sisteme).
Solicităm clarificarea exactă a acestei cerințe și, dacă termenul „per node” implică o configurație mai complexă (de ex. sistem multi-node sau cluster), ajustarea specificațiilor pentru a elimina ambiguitatea.
Answer (5 Mar 2025, 11:06):
Stimate solicitant,
Vă mulțumim pentru solicitarea de clarificare privind cerința de cache din cadrul Lotului nr. 3 – Enterprise Storage (SAS SSD). În cele ce urmează, dorim să oferim o definiție clară a termenului „per node” și justificarea acestei cerințe.
Clarificare privind „per node”
Termenul „per node” în contextul cerinței de cache se referă la fiecare unitate fizică de procesare (nod) din arhitectura soluției de stocare. Aceasta înseamnă că:
1. Cache-ul minim de 512 GB trebuie să fie disponibil pentru fiecare nod fizic individual al sistemului de stocare, și nu ca sumă totală la nivel de cluster sau întregul sistem de stocare.
2. În cazul unei soluții multi-node (cu mai multe unități de procesare care formează un cluster), fiecare nod trebuie să dispună de cel puțin 512 GB de cache dedicat.
3. Această cerință nu se referă la un cache global distribuit între noduri, ci la resursele de memorie specifice fiecărui nod în parte.
Justificarea cerinței
• Performanță optimă și scalabilitate: Această abordare asigură că fiecare unitate a sistemului de stocare poate gestiona eficient sarcinile de lucru, fără a depinde de alte noduri pentru resursele de cache.
• Fiabilitate și reziliență: În cazul unui sistem multi-node, fiecare nod trebuie să aibă propriul cache pentru a evita bottle-neck-uri și a asigura continuitatea operațiunilor în scenariile de failover.
• Funcționalități avansate: Cerințele suplimentare privind cache mirroring, alocarea dinamică și persistența cache-ului necesită resurse de memorie dedicate pentru fiecare nod individual, astfel încât să fie garantată consistența și protecția datelor.
Prin urmare, cerința rămâne aplicabilă fiecărui nod fizic (per node) din cadrul sistemului de stocare, indiferent de numărul total de noduri dintr-o configurație clusterizată.
Unfortunately, questions can be asked only during the "Active" period.
Clarifications
Document successfully signed
OK